How Many Researchers: The FY 2022 Cumulative Investigator Rate 

Posted

We are pleased to share our annual snapshot of how many researchers NIH supports. These fiscal year (FY) 2022 data are also available in the NIH Data Book (see report #303) and represent awards made with traditional and supplemental coronavirus appropriations. Please keep in mind that these data are distinct from success rates, however, which are application-based metrics (see this post).

Our cumulative investigator rate is an NIH-wide person-based metric. The metric is calculated as the number of unique principal investigators who were designated on an NIH research project grant (RPG), activity or mechanism, divided by the number of unique principal investigators who were designated on applications over a five-year period. For simplicity, we will refer to those investigators as either “awardees” or “applicants” in this post. And, we focus on a five-year timeframe because most research grants last for more than one year, and applicants submit applications with the goal to secure multiple years of funding. We also only count someone once if they are designated on separate applications from the same or multiple NIH Institutes or Centers in a particular five-year timeframe.

Figure 1 shows cumulative investigator rate data for RPGs between FYs 2003 and 2022. Applicants are in blue bars, awardees in orange bars, and the funding rate itself is the gray line. NIH supported 36,594 awardees in FY 2022, out of 92,465 applicants. This is an increase of 4.0% and 0.5%, respectively, over FY 2021, and the cumulative investigator rate was 39.6%.

Figure 1. Cumulative Investigator Rate: Research Project Grants: FY 2003 to 2022

Figure 1 shows a combined bar and line graph with applicants, awardees, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate for RPGs over time. The X axis is fiscal years 2003 to 2022, while the Y axis is either the absolute number for applicants and awardees from 0 to 100,000, or a percent for the Cumulative Investigator Rate from 0 to 100. Awardees, applicants, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate are shown in separate orange bars, blue bars, and a gray line, respectively.

The table below highlights FY 2022 data for R01-equivalent, R21, and P01 grant types. As noted earlier, please see report #303 in the Data Book for more details.

Grant TypeApplicantsAwardeesCumulative Investigator Rate
R01-equivalent69,56830,41143.7%
R2139,5954,78912.1%
P011,23144636.2%

The cumulative investigator rate for R01-equivalent grants rose to 43.7% in FY 2022, 0.9 percentage points over the previous year (Figure 2). There were 30,411 awardees out of 69,568 applicants, which is more awardees as well as applicants than in FY 2021.

Figure 2. Cumulative Investigator Rate: R01-equivalent Grants FY 2003 to 2022

Figure 2 shows a combined bar and line graph with applicants, awardees, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate for R01-equivalent grants. The X axis is fiscal years 2003 to 2022, while the Y axis is either the absolute number for applicants and awardees from 0 to 80,000, or a percent for the Cumulative Investigator Rate from 0 to 100. Awardees, applicants, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate are shown in separate orange bars, blue bars, and a gray line, respectively.

The R21 cumulative investigator rate did go up in FY 2022 (Figure 3). Out of 39,595 applicants, there were 4,789 awardees, for a 12.1% Cumulative Investigator Rate. Though the rate did inch up compared to FY 2021, it has been markedly low for over a decade. Thus, as we mentioned last year, we still encourage applicants consider other NIH grant types (such as R01-equivalents), especially since R21s are shorter and smaller grants and do not necessarily increase success for a future larger award.

Figure 3. Cumulative Investigator Rate: R21 Grants FY 2003 to 2022

Figure 3 shows a combined bar and line graph with applicants, awardees, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate for R21s. The X axis is fiscal years 2003 to 2022, while the Y axis is either the absolute number for applicants and awardees from 0 to 45,000, or a percent for the Cumulative Investigator Rate from 0 to 100. Awardees, applicants, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate are shown in separate orange bars, blue bars, and a gray line, respectively.

Though there were more P01 program applicants in FY 2022 compared to 2021, nearly the same number of awards were made (Figure 4). This resulted in the cumulative investigator rate decreasing to 36.2%.

Figure 4. Cumulative Investigator Rate: P01 Grants FY 2003 to 2022

Figure 4 shows a combined bar and line graph with applicants, awardees, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate for P01 grants. The X axis is fiscal years 2003 to 2022, while the Y axis is either the absolute number for applicants and awardees from 0 to 2,000, or a percent for the Cumulative Investigator Rate from 0 to 100. Awardees, applicants, and the Cumulative Investigator Rate are shown in separate orange bars, blue bars, and a gray line, respectively.

We are pleased that the cumulative investigator rate for RPGs and R01-equivalent grants continued to increase over recent years.

I would like to thank my colleagues in the Office of Extramural Research Division of Statistical Analysis and Reporting for their work on these analyses.

2 Comments

  1. It’s discouraging that the success rate and number of funded investigators have only minimally increased over 20 years. The fact that triaged grants (50-60% of grants submitted) and same fiscal year resubmissions (when virtually no grant is funded on the first submission) aren’t counted makes the success rates look much better than they really are.

Before submitting your comment, please review our blog comment policies.

Leave a Reply to Betty S. Pace Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *