A new, electronic system has been developed to facilitate electronic disbursement of reviewers’ honoraria and reimbursements for expenses incurred during their participation in NIH peer review meetings.
A CD encryption process will not only make encrypted reviewer CDs as secure as before, but will greatly reduce the effort required by the reviewers to access the data within.
0 Comments
You are cordially invited to the NIH campus in Bethesda, Maryland, to speak with RCDC staff about the new RCDC public reporting website.
0 Comments
Through its readiness and recovery efforts, the NIH is helping the Biomedical Community respond to natural disasters. While such disasters may be inevitable, the setbacks they present to medical research hopefully need not be.
0 Comments
Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., the director of the National Institutes of Health, September 24 announced his plans to step down at the end of October 2008 to pursue writing projects and explore other professional opportunities.
0 Comments
After an extensive year-long effort, preliminary implementation plans for the 2009 through 2010 calendar years are now available for the implementation of the Enhancement of Peer Review Activity.
0 Comments
On September 11, 2008 the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property heard testimony on a proposed amendment to reverse current law requiring NIH-funded research be publicly accessible. The NIH Public Access Policy remains unchanged, and complete compliance with the Policy is expected of all NIH-funded researchers.
0 Comments
While you wait for the Adobe forms, download the FOA and develop your research plan today!
0 Comments
A recording of the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare IACUC Staff Online Seminar, “Freedom of Information Act Policies,” held on September 18, 2008, is now available for viewing from the OLAW Web page http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/e-seminars.htm.
0 Comments
The Center for Scientific Review (CSR), whose national database of volunteer reviewers now includes over 3,000 highly qualified investigators, invites scientific societies to recommend exemplary reviewers to serve in review groups.
0 Comments
0 Comments